On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 22:12 +0000, Duncan wrote: > I had thought the resign/leave/whatever procedure was well laid out -- > the person next in elective order (the one that "just missed", so to > speak) got the spot. There had been some debate as to a cutoff, since > (assuming a reasonably larger group of candidates than spots) at some > point the ranking can be said to be voting /against/ a particular > candidate, likely by the last one, anyway, but to my knowledge nothing > ever came of said discussion, and it continues down the list in order to > the last candidate, if necessary.
The next person is only accepted if the entire remaining Council unanimously accepts the person. This really is there to allow a rejection to keep us from going "in the red" on our candidates. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
