Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti: >>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: > >>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual >>> packages. > >> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable >> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable, >> they are fine to go stable. > > Yes, I think this part is clear. > > The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.: > keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before > the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for > virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.) > > Ulrich
The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably best to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will object to normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you think? Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
