-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > So, only this reply. > > May I conclude that nobody objects to the above? > > Ulrich
Wearing only my perl team hat, it would seem to lowly me that if a virtual points to packages foo and bar, and both foo and bar were tested and marked stable by the arch's previously, that its silly to then wait for them to mark the virtual stable as well, since at least in my perception the only function of that virtual is to say use one of these packages - which have already been marked stable. /me hopes some arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position - -- - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGXpVDq1ztTp5/Ti4RAn3fAJ93fLU/G2QOB5p6jeGQst4lnyXEWgCfeuPg kQDUKObUWKYcIWndm6zGm6U= =beGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
