On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:22:41 -0700 Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could we not simply rename it, as has been suggested many times thus > far? Then we could mask ion3 and let people know why and what it was > renamed to, et al.
Presumably this would require maintaining updated documentation, patches to change the program binary name and configuration paths etc... In which case it should be done as an external fork, not a Gentoo thing. Really, I don't see why there's a need to go out of the way for this. Upstream clearly don't want their package in the tree, and the devmanual [1] says that that wish should be respected. [1]: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/tree/index.html -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
