Wulf C. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is > not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc. > So those issues seem unresolved.
Well, this arguments are nothing new, just read this ml.. However, i don't think think his reasoning is justified here. We do inform the user, everything else is not within our reach. And imho the license doesn't require more. If i get a cease and desist over *that*, well, screw it. -- Regards, Matti Bickel Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgp4MSlQKyGCY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
