Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As >> others have questioned, how are games more important than security >> bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing >> the security team to mark packages as stable would make a lot more >> sense, imho.
There has never been an exception for games. There is however, no one willing to beat games herd (and others) with a stick sufficiently often that they stop. I don't even see how this is a policy discussion at all as the policy is more or less clear to me; is it unclear for others? This is an enforcement problem, no? -Alec -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
