On Tue, 01 May 2007 21:51:17 -0400 Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, but now you're requiring me to go through all that extra work > if I want any of the benefits of EAPI=1.
It is likely that EAPI-1 will be stricter in quite a few areas... > Or, third option, is that everyone marks their packages as "low > priority tests, don't run them" just to switch to EAPI=1, and we have > no gain over what we have now. No, even that's a gain. It means that arch teams *know* when a test failure isn't a problem. But 'everyone' won't do that. > I think this thread in general overestimates the value of tests in > packages. To maintainers, possibly. Not to arch teams. The way test suites are now makes arch teams' jobs a lot harder than they should be. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
