On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:34:07 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:55:05AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that! > > No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't > > know how much work whatever it is is. > > > > Having said that, there's no need to figure it out for the whole > > tree in one go if it's an EAPI change. > > Please stop stating that fallacy; binding it into an EAPI version > means you *have* to plan for the whole tree (meaning figure it out up > front).
It means figuring it out up front, but not changing the whole tree at once, which is where the problem is. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
