On Wednesday 02 of May 2007 00:28:42 Josh Saddler wrote: > Not a knee jerk reaction, just a strong one. One of the key reasons why > mandatory tests were not desired was the fact that sometimes much more > stuff will be installed than what you'd normally get. Exhibit A: > robbat2's message just sent on diradm that normally just needs openldap > with USE=minimal, but building for tests requires all of openldap, > samba, etc. Where did you read that this thread is about forcing tests? That was the black and white approach and we all know how it failed... The purpose of this discussion is to figure out a compromise between the current state and force all, because neither of them is good.
-- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
