Ned Ludd wrote: > I don't see anything wrong with how it was proposed originally using > contact=0
The reason why "contact" isn't perfect was given by Mart leio Raudsepp yet, namely: > contact=0 in metadata.xml in this context means that the automatic > reassigning should not assign to that maintainer, but when a user looks > whom to ask specific questions from and sees contact=0 he/she will > understand he/she is not to contact that person as the value is zero, > but Daniel wants them to contact precisely him in that case. > A different keyword might be better for that reason. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
