On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:04:25 +0000 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Goodyear wrote: > > Underlying the draft code of conduct is an assumption that > > aggressive and less-than-nice behavior on gentoo-dev is seriously > > harming Gentoo. > > Well you've recently lost two very capable devs as a result of it, > and I understand others have left for similar reasons, so i'd say it > is seriously harming Gentoo. Quite apart from the reputational damage.
You need to distinguish between why a developer left and why he said he left. > Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else > could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a > group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others > have informed us all. Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again) as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and flameeyes' stated reason for leaving... > No one's been complaining about the user forums, apart from ciaran > afaict Oh, I assure you I'm not the only person to have serious issues with the forums. A number of Gentoo developers and former Gentoo developers have expressed similar views to mine on the subject... -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
