On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:30:11 +0000 George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to > > get rid of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them. > > > You would certainly make that point. then let the other employee > leave and let the employee in question know that it will not be > tolerated in the future. Therefore saving the services of one of the > best employees (and with it money) and also said employee > knows /exactly/ where he stands for the future.
And if said employee had already pulled several "I'm resigning" publicity stunts in the past? And if said employee had seen other people trying the same thing unsuccessfully? I think you're missing a clear view of the facts here... Incidentally, I'm unsure as to how your analogy applies here. You keep mentioning 'best employee'. I'm not sure how that fits in. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
