OK, but it appears that PMS is not hosted on Gentoo infrastructure, and its development is not controlled by Gentoo. Therefore it is not a Gentoo project, and therefore the Council, QA, etc. should not be treating it if it is a Gentoo project.
Right? -Daniel On 3/2/07, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Robbins wrote: > I don't understand half of what you said. > > You are saying that PMS is a sub-project of QA? Is the PMS spec hosted > on Gentoo infrastructure? > > From all I have read, PMS is meant to define the functionality of > Paludis itself, which is not a Gentoo project. Because of this, PMS > can't be considered a Gentoo project. That may be what it's meant to do now, but that was not the original purpose. It was originally to be a written specification of EAPI=0, which is essentially portage's current functionality. It's only later that the whole PMS == Paludis thing came about. -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
