On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:27:06 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 February 2007, Ned Ludd wrote: > > Please read over what's been talked about elsewhere in this thread. > > He is not trying to break existing functionality at all. Only > > extend it to be posix aware (additionally) > > erm, no ... our code is a superset of POSIX, so technically yes he is > breaking existing functionality and doing the quite opposite of > extending -mike True, but remember that this only applies for when /bin/sh isn't bash. So this will mainly affect FreeBSD and embedded, but it at least gives them a better chance of working from the get-go if baselayout at least supports it. Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
