On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:39:05 +0100 "Rob C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best. > > I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed > because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the > project may have changed since the last vote and in any case that > developer would be free to partake in the running vote with #2. > > Cheers > -Rob Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th. Rinse and repeat. If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
