On Mon, 2007-29-01 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST] > > > Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either > > > he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th. > > > Rinse and repeat. > > > If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. > > > > > > > Agreed. #3 > > > > >From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste > > of time and resources. > > My only qualm with this approach is whether or not we then risk > promoting a candidate who was resoundingly defeated during the actual > election to a Council position because only a handful of people ran for > the position.
Don't we have a "re-open nominations" item in our electoral process? If so, we can decide to consider only candidates who are above that threshold. -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
