On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:42, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:18:51 +0100 > > Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know that I'm a bit late on this, but to me the "version 2 or > > later" is a license by itself. Let's call it GPL-RENEW and let the > > file have contents like: > > "This package is licensed with the version x or later clause for the > > GPL." > > This is effectively what Diego was proposing with the 'GPL-2+' name.
Except that a GPL-RENEW tag would be transparent over newer GPL releases too. Upstreams will likely release under gpl-3 and newer. My solution would handle it transparently. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpnQxf1nFKEI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
