On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:43:18PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 04:37:44 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:27:39PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:05:49 +0000 Steve Long > | > | Secondly, how difficult would it be for you to do what he asked? I > | > | know it's not your responsibility, I just want to know whether you > | > | can do it fairly easily. > | > > | > It's a couple of hours work, and it requires tree access... > | > | anoncvs is available, just split a patch (tree wide changes could > | stand reviewing anyways). > > Yeah, because a tree-wide patch against a changing tree is really > practical.
Your changes will be fairly limited; pretty much tweaking LICENSE vars, mangling/adding to license/. Yes, the tree changes, but it doesn't change fast enough for such a patch to be instantly worthless (nor worthless in a few weeks, albeit a bit dated). Such a change *should* have review anyways, since LICENSE isn't something that should be arbitrarily screwed with. Keep in mind that someone else is going to have to handle the patch anyways, so it's out of your hands at that point; let them worry about how to handle it, meanwhile you're after the change so throw the delta their way. Donnie already stated he'd take a patch, so throw the patch his direction if you want things changed. ~harring
pgpLXmfgrUl8v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
