On Friday 10 November 2006 16:28, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason > > to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. > > However I'm still waiting for the explanation why it is on that list. > > (I don't mind if it's masked for a good reason, but I need to know > > that reason). > > There is no immediate reason, of course. However, gtk+-1 and glib-1 > will be removed as soon after the big cleanup as is feasible, and > sylpheed-clasws-1.x is a gtk+-1 app, and therefore must go as well. I > didn't generate the list, but my understanding was that it was intended > to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome > 1.x.
Gtk1 actually is broken for --as-needed. It's linking is broken thanks to a libtool which refuses to link against a non-installed libgdk. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpVuNDHFCX0V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
