Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > We (gnome) are not going to maintain gtk+-1. We would very much prefer > it get removed. If some other person or group wants to maintain it, I > guess it's fine with me; it will only cause Jakub and company headaches > for re-assigning all the bugs that mistakenly get assigned to gnome. > > Note that maintaining it basically means being upstream, as there is no > upstream for it. > I have at least one package depending on it. Feel free to make me the maintainer of the gtk+-1.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
