On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:23:49 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): | > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:57:37 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | I picked a random e-mail to reply to. I don't maintain that many | > | packages (maybe 10 or so?). But if I have a bug (particularly a | > | sec bug as in this case) and you haven't stablized it after five | > | months then I'll probably just nuke the ebuild and drop your | > | keywords | > | > Which is dumb. There's no harm to be had in just leaving the ebuild | > there. | | Accumulating broken old vulnerable and unsupported junk in tree
There is no accumulation. It's already there. And if packages are that bad, perhaps you should ask yourself why they have a stable keyword at all. | for the sole sake of arches that noone cares about enough to keyword | something newer for months If you're taking that argument, one could just as easily claim that the packages should be removed entirely since the arch teams don't care enough to keyword them. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
