Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:57:37 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | I picked a random e-mail to reply to. I don't maintain that many > | packages (maybe 10 or so?). But if I have a bug (particularly a sec > | bug as in this case) and you haven't stablized it after five months > | then I'll probably just nuke the ebuild and drop your keywords > > Which is dumb. There's no harm to be had in just leaving the ebuild > there.
Accumulating broken old vulnerable and unsupported junk in tree for the sole sake of arches that noone cares about enough to keyword something newer for months harms everyone who uses rsync, wastes disk space for users, wastes disk space on mirrors, makes CVS and portage slower, wastes maintainers time... No harm? Nonsense. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature