>> Have you ever looked into Makefile.PL in the past? Or have you even
>> taken a look at the Makefile.PL.in is it existed? It shows that many of
>> the "-l"-options are generated by configure. (Makefile.PL.in is template
>> for configure - you surely know that)
>>
>> Or are we talking about some seperate PerlMagick-Distribution? I'm
>> talking about the PerlMagick which comes with imagemagick's tarball.
>>
>> Actually, Makefile.PL should use pkgconfig or whatever is available to
>> detect all those "-l" options - or actually it's also sufficient to only
>> do -lMagick - who knows?
>>
> 
> Well, as former maintainer of PerlMagick in Gentoo, I can tell you that
> the way we used to do it was to take the tarball that is used to build
> imagemagick and reuse it for building perlmagick, building only the perl
> portions and ensuring that we were binding against the correct libraries
> on $root. But hey, what do I know, I only maintained it for 2 or 3
> years.

I asked questions about all those -l options that include libraries -
but which libraries have to be included while linking the Magick.so of
the perl-module highly depends on the use-flags.

So you didn't answer the question. That you were the
PerlMagick-maintainer for a log time - well - as long as nobody
complains, i wouldn't look at the command line with which Magick.so is
linked, too. So i guess you just don't know what i'm talking about.


I'm sorry, that my patches don't work. I will take a closer look immediatly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to