On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 17:44 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: > I'm sorry, but how sure are you about this? > > Have you ever looked into Makefile.PL in the past? Or have you even > taken a look at the Makefile.PL.in is it existed? It shows that many of > the "-l"-options are generated by configure. (Makefile.PL.in is template > for configure - you surely know that) > > Or are we talking about some seperate PerlMagick-Distribution? I'm > talking about the PerlMagick which comes with imagemagick's tarball. > > Actually, Makefile.PL should use pkgconfig or whatever is available to > detect all those "-l" options - or actually it's also sufficient to only > do -lMagick - who knows? >
Well, as former maintainer of PerlMagick in Gentoo, I can tell you that the way we used to do it was to take the tarball that is used to build imagemagick and reuse it for building perlmagick, building only the perl portions and ensuring that we were binding against the correct libraries on $root. But hey, what do I know, I only maintained it for 2 or 3 years. -- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o----------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
