* Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: hi,
> What would it do if a gcc-specific option is used for which > the real compiler does not provide any option, even with a > different name? hmm, tricky. I've filed an bug in gcc-upstream for an similar issue, where gcc/ld is missing some an flag allowing to filter exported symbols of shared libs. Hopefully this issue will be solved soon by the gcc team. Until then I have to strip off that option, hoping it does not break anything. But nevertheless it would be a great step to adapt at least those options which are supported. Completely unsupported options (which cannot be substituted somehow) are a major problem anyways. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
