On Thu, 2006-06-07 at 13:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:29:39 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | On Thursday 06 July 2006 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > Sounds rather flaky and unreliable... > | Sounds rather vague and without arguments. > > Well, you're assuming that > a) everyone's using a C compiler,
If you're on Gentoo, I sure hope you have a C compiler > b) that gcc has the slightest clue what it's doing, Again, if you've compiled your whole system with gcc, I guess its a safe bet > c) that the user has no problem using nasty hacks to regain control, Since when is setting your -march/-mnosse/-mnommx/-mno3dnow a nasty hack? > d) that this information is only needed at compile time, I agree this is a problem.. > e) that various gcc internal definitions won't change... We can always change the eclass and check the GCC version if that happens. -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
