On 2006.07.07 14:27, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 02:31 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> The more I think about the issue and the more I like the complete
> profiles for amd64 more than the other solutions.
I don't even *want* to think of what this would be for x86.
These are what I can think of, so far, with regards to different
support
on different chips.
x86 (everything)
i586 (everything i586-compatible)
i586 + mmx (pentium-mmx)
i686 (everything i686-compatible)
i686 + mmx (pentium2+, athlon+)
i686 + mmx + sse (pentium3+, athlon-xp+)
i686 + mmx + sse + sse2 (pentium4+, athlon64+, opteron+)
i686 + mmx + see + sse2 + sse3 (some pentium4, some athlon64, some
opteron)
i686 + mmx + 3dnow (athlon+)
i686 + mmx + 3dnow + sse (athlon-xp+)
i686 + mmx + 3dnow + sse + sse2 (athlon64+, opteron+)
i686 + mmx + 3dnow + sse + sse2 + sse3 (some athlon64, some opteron)
[snip]
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
Chris,
Its east to make worse too. There's mmxext and 3dnowext too.
Regards,
Roy Bamford
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
