-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it should be done and show the technical merit. Ciaran I will give you that you are a capable programmer, and had valid arguments in this thread. However, when interacting with people and proving points on merits you seem to go out of your way to not prove anything and throw examples out there without really backing them up. > > No, Diego. The argument is that you're coming up with a horrible > and unnecessary hack where there are far cleaner alternatives, and > that you're blindly sticking to it and trying to throw off any > objections by devious means because you don't want to scrap said > hack after all the misguided effort you've spent on it. However, > since you seem to be incapable of admitting the gaping flaws in > your own work, I'm asking for someone else to point this out to you > in a formal manner rather than watch this thread go on for even > longer. >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErYFLSENan+PfizARAjzzAJwIue9UDtwsANxaaqqnVJVr0jTz6ACglAL6 cO7O0Pw+CGDfFlVdY7z1N3o= =6G6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
