On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:30:42AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 03 July 2006 08:06, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages > > > > are now in the tree because of it? What new developers have been > > > > recruited because of it? What packages that were previously without > > > > maintainers in the tree have found maintainers due to Sunrise? > > > > > > why do any of these matter at this point of time ? you cant kill a > > > project for failing to accomplish any of its goals when it hasnt been > > > given real time yet to actually accomplish them > > > > Nor was I trying to in any way. Instead, I don't see any point in > > discussing something that still needs time to mature. The project > > hasn't been around long enough to accomplish anything, so again, what is > > there to discuss? > > the project was suspended because developers were severely unhappy with it > > the issues are whether said developers feel all of their grievances have been > addressed ... so far it would appear so > > debating whether the project has/is will accomplish things is out of > scope/off > topic > -mike
No, brix is certainly not happy with a overlay like sunrise in any official capacity. This should be clear from the meeting [1] that was held between sunrise (jokey and genstef), userrel (represented by christel), brix and myself. Instead brix suggested a different solution to the problem, namely a "proxy maintainer" project that everybody seemed to be happy about at the meeting. However, while brix sees the proxy maintainer project as a replacement for the current sunrise project jokey and genstef sees it as a welcome addition. In any case it's not true that everybody is happy with sunrise yet. Regards, Bryan Østergaard 1. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/39764 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
