Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Doty wrote: >> It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I >> did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is >> willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put >> forth yesterday. > > I agree that it is devrel's place to help people find a compromise. I > disagree that it is devrel's place to set general technical policy based > on this compromise by saying "All non-Gentoo hosted overlays are subject > to this" when the compromise does not involve all the relevant people. > > Thanks, > Donnie > What you're missing here is that I did not make a technical decision. I implemented the councils recommendations in such a manner as to not piss off either side too much. If you're familiar with US leagalize, you should view this as a temporary injunction.
I implore you and other interested developers to address the remaining points through constructive discussion and then ask the council to make a final decision. Here are a list of points that I feel need more discussion: 1. Different types of overlays: gentoo.org vs. non-gentoo.org and developer focused vs. user focused. 2. Appropriate use of bugzilla for overlays of all varieties. 3. Appropriate use of www.gentoo.org/proj for overlays. -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead Gentoo Developer Relations Gentoo Recruitment Lead Gentoo Infrastructure GPG: 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 ======================================================= -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
