Alec Warner wrote: > I believe that jakub finds this devrel decision a step out of bounds > (not sure if anyone else detected the that in his statement) and saying > that to the java folks is moreso a way of pointing out just how silly it > is :) I mean if he was serious, he would have addressed the PHP > overlay, the webapps overlay...etc...
No, because those are now hosted by Gentoo. > Look, I was on IRC yesterday, the whole thing was a mess. For once I'm > not going to step on devrels balls for this one. Someone had to do > something. For once I'm tired of *someone acting* and then getting > nailed for it because its not their place. Am I thrilled with the > outcome? No not really. Apparently neither is Jakub. Thats all fine. > Can always overturn it later. Or we can discuss it endlessly here with > no outcome, or we can make the council decide on what the proper use of > bugzilla is. Or we can all realize that we can't get our way all the > time and compromise with other projects*. Yes, but as Seemant said, all those affected in the decision should be involved (or at least represented) in the compromise. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
