-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
Thanks,
Donnie
Sorry, but I must second this, especially as discussions have also
been continuing that (unlike Mike's discussion) actually included
council members.
I'm all for folks trying to help resolve the Sunrise issues, but I
feel that it's not devrel's place to be deciding this particular
policy issue, especially when the issue has already been referred to
the council.
Best regards,
Stu
FWIW, there was almost an hour's worth of discussion before the start of
the log KingTaco posted. As a bystander, my guess is that the discussion
took place in the devrel channel because a complaint about the use of the
bugzilla whiteboard by the sunrise folks was brought up in that channel.
The compromise was made to defuse further escalation to a formal complaint
to devrel.
/Anders
- --
Anders Hellgren (kallamej)
Gentoo Forums Administrator
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEm5a5FX025WX+RG4RAvVOAKCQICkWz0MTJ4snNN0mdNT1MF/aWQCgrtQ2
rL5SMgybISpQLn7Lh52UO8A=
=Y6ad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
