W dniu 11.02.2026 o 18:29, Andreas Sturmlechner pisze:
On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2026 18:02:09 MET Filip Kobierski wrote:
Users are encouraged to migrate to another tool like
app-admin/pass or vaultwarden.
I think app-admin/keepass is a more natural choice here since
it supports .kbdx files unlike pass, and is stable,
unlike vaultwarden.
app-admin/pass-import can import your .kbdx or so I've heard. Guides exist.
This is not a legend but a fact :) it works is usable and stable. I have
migrated my insanely huge KDB over to pass (yes it took >5 mins but worked).
Stuck on QT5. Endangered by the QT5 purge. Needs porting to QT6.
I have close to no GUI programming experience so I do not think
I will have the time to do the qt6 migration upstream.
I would prefer to keep using keepassxc even if that meant
maintaining it. Does it make sense for me to step up?
A token maintainer will not stop this package from being treecleaned.
Fixes to packaging can be made irrespective of you registering as maintainer,
and upstream currently do not give you anything else to work with. As long as
they don't deliver future prospects, or *you* come up with the Qt6 porting
commit yourself, I don't think it makes sense.
Regards
--
Have a great day!
~ Maciej Barć
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt
9B0A 4C5D 02A3 B43C 9D6F D6B1 14D7 4A1F 43A6 AC3
