On Saturday 25 March 2006 12:42, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > If you're suggesting CVS as the second VCS (i.e. in addition to SVN) > then I don't see the point - SVN is simply a better CVS and clients > should be available on the alt platforms. No, I was just stating the fact that cvs in itself is cheap wrt dependencies. I try to avoid using it myself if I haven't to.
> Language issues aside, it makes sense to support a distributed VCS in > addition to SVN, as that would provide a useful alternative. Acknowledged. I find it useful myself, the only problem I see is, as I said, that darcs is not as cheap as cvs or svn, or even as bazaar-ng and mercurial, wrt dependencies. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgplBNKJdYwsy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
