On Thursday 09 March 2006 05:28, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
>
> Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and
> non-stripped binaries, I'd say...

not a valid argument ... look at the code and you'll see we *already* run 
`file` on every ELF
-mike

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to