On Thursday 09 March 2006 05:28, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not > > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries > > Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and > non-stripped binaries, I'd say...
not a valid argument ... look at the code and you'll see we *already* run `file` on every ELF -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list