Renat Lumpau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Yes. Here's a quote from Halcy0n (with his permission): > > Don't mistake me not getting involved for approval. I am just not going to > get involved in every single dev->dev disagreement, and certainly not when I > do not have all of the facts. I wasn't aware that every team leader was > accountable for how devs on their team behaved. > > This is not meant as a comment on Halcy0n's abilities as a team leader, as I > understand he has attempted to manage the issue but "reasonable effort" has > failed. > > So, my concern is: if the QA team can't manage its members effectively, should > they be entrusted with tree-wide powers?
Since one dev so far has stepped "out of line", and this is by no means the
only time it has happened, I don't see how this argument has any
merit. If it becomes a pattern where all members of the QA team are
causing problems, then I can see it as being valid.
I don't think you will find one person that is going to say they are
capable of changing how Ciaran interacts with people. This is an
entirely different issue though, and I have talked to Ciaran about it.
What I was saying above is that I am not going to go and get involved
every single time someone has a disagreement. This situation has
obviously grown to be ridiculous and I have had a talk with him about
it, so he knows my feelings on the situation, and what I expect.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpHicwMpXnag.pgp
Description: PGP signature
