-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub Moc schrieb:
| 28.2.2006, 18:38:10, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

| No, I won't claim that... I'd rather love to know why didn't you point out
| to an obvious eclass flaw about 30 emails and many hours ago, saving
us from
| all the eclass formating, slotting and ewarn blurb. The above needs to be
| fixed, period.
|
| To return to the original topic - focus your QA efforts on real
issues. Same
| goes for that non-interactivity stuff. QA that serves no other purpose
than
interactivie stuff in the tree (outside of pkg_config() function) _is_ a
QA problem.

| inventing problems to enforce an inevitably hackish solution (there's no
| good one because the needed tools are not available) is not useful at all.

| Portage is a tool to install and manage packages, and serves no good
purpose
| on its own. Crippling installed packages and their available features for
| the sole purpose of having nice ebuild tree with clean bash code is
not what
| QA is for. Improving the whole process is fine and welcome, as long as it
Wrong. This is exactly what QA is for. There are additional duties for
the QA team beside clean bash code.

Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEBKe7aVNL8NrtU6IRAl75AKCT9h+9V4sM9YxRgIoaD+136dug9ACgkqoI
chBYTGNn2hEChDAi/WfV1+k=
=INNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to