28.2.2006, 19:39:15, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> <snip> ewarn "This ebuild overrides the default SLOT behaviour for >> webapps" ewarn "If this package installs files into the htdocs dir, this >> is" ewarn "probably a bug in the ebuild." </snip> >> >> Sigh... what kind of QA issue is that?
> which part dont you understand ? the user sets a variable and then is told > that the package probably contains a bug ... seems pretty confusing to me > -mike rl03 already replied to that. I don't see any QA issues there, and if someone from QA team does, then he probably has too much time to ponder over the tree and invent issues where they don't exist. I don't see any point "fixing" this, at least until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented. Portage QA notices may be equally confusing to the users, with this kind of logic, yet they stay there - and number of people complaining about USE_EXPAND notices is much higher than the number of people who complained about confusing ewarn from webapps slot (exactly zero is far as I could find). Once again, don't invent problems, please. -- jakub
pgpdQ4EP3Mcai.pgp
Description: PGP signature
