On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:00:03 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > PVR includes the revision of an ebuild. This means that if a | > revbump is made on a webapp package to fix a critical flaw, users | > will still have the old broken package installed too. This is | > especially relevant for security issues, but also applies to other | > kinds of fix. | | Not including the revision into the SLOT can break the apps by | removing the needed files from a live site... I still can't see any | *QA* violation there.
Again, that's a design flaw. It's an eclass that's abusing SLOT, thus it's a QA issue. | Yeah, it checks for that since that's the way the eclass is designed. | You can't declare a slot in a kernel ebuild either. One is a design flaw. The other is not. | Well, starts to be boring - so, either come with something valid from | QA standpoint or stop now. This is a valid issue from a QA standpoint. This is also why I'm not going to waste my time doing a proper list -- rather than addressing issues, they are being passed off as irrelevant or even features. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
