On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent
> elsewhere.

So let me get this straight. 

You have been claiming that webapp-config is broken, to put it mildly, for quite
some time (at least several months). Yet as of now, you are unable to tell us
what exactly is wrong. When I asked you on IRC for feedback, you referred me to
a private conversation with Stuart, which is just as useless as the rest of your
comments. You have not filed a single bug or sent a single email to the
maintainers. Your only relevant QA point is a trivial style issue. 

Your blathering is insulting to the people who actually spend time trying to
improve webapp-config. No, it's not perfect. But we want to make it better, and
we have asked you for feedback and got none.

You, ciaranm, create measurable deadweight loss. Instead of doing productive
work, I waste my time replying to your nonsense. I am fed up and will be taking
the issue to devrel.

-- 
Renat Lumpau       all things web-apps
C6A838DA           04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5  D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA
America - land of the free*
*Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.

Attachment: pgpmuYgynOwx3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to