28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote:

> Hi Jakub,

> If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your
> opposition earlier?

I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual,
what would be the point in that? I'm raising my hand against silently
incorporating parts of it (that affect a lot of stuff in the tree) into
official docs without a proper discussion, even more so that they are being
claimed as an official QA policy now. Documents located in private devspace
of some devs are non-official and noone checks their contents for
correctness, they are private activity of those devs.

> If you agree with the contents, please ask yourself if the current
> discussion is necessary.

See above.

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

Attachment: pgpCnRIPUEj5F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to