On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent
> elsewhere.

Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general and 
assurance in particular? This is something that repoman might check for, 
and issue a warning. It has nothing to do with end-user quality. It even 
is no problem for developers trying to understand the ebuild. It is only 
a coding style violation, not a QA violation. Coding style is to present 
a uniform view to things, so things look proper. QA is about things being 
proper, not looking proper.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Attachment: pgphVi8WirX0J.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to