On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting > a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I > have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent > elsewhere.
Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general and assurance in particular? This is something that repoman might check for, and issue a warning. It has nothing to do with end-user quality. It even is no problem for developers trying to understand the ebuild. It is only a coding style violation, not a QA violation. Coding style is to present a uniform view to things, so things look proper. QA is about things being proper, not looking proper. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgphVi8WirX0J.pgp
Description: PGP signature