On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:52 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:38:17 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | You still haven't posted posted a *single example* of webapp-config
> | brokeness. You, I'd say you should either back up claims about "all
> | the ways in which webapp-config is broken" or apologize to the
> | concerned developers for false claims.
>
> Fine. If posting a single way in which webapp-config is broken will
> make you happy, here you go:
>
> From webapp.eclass:
>
> function webapp_read_config ()
> {
>
> This is a whitespace / coding style breakage. The correct format should
> be:
>
> webapp_read_config() {
>
> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent
> elsewhere.
Wow. That is ... impressive. After about two days of asking for any real
bugs you are able to show a trivial syntax issue?Please stop yelling "it si teh b0rk!" if you can't even list any serious issues, and stop being rude to other people. Thanks, Patrick -- Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
