-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Muraco wrote: | Another thing that I don't like, is the feel of this method does seem | "offical" enough.. mostly because portage is not 'stable'-aware, Its | just using a stripped down tree.
What do you want then? If an entire standalone tree distributed by Gentoo doesn't feel official enough, what will? Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwSWAXVaO67S1rtsRAo7rAJ9YAf+Z3UUsshKfURP71lKqL5PjLwCdGcem czZJv0hCE0XbT9pjjZOtaiY= =GdT8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
