Duncan wrote: > Because that code will be implemented in portage, and the portage dev > likely to implement it said it was a superfluous reference. =8^) > > Still, I'd prefer it referenced just for definition's sake, but when the > portage dev says it isn't a superfluous reference, and that particular > section is specifying portage implementation...
Nope, that particular section is specifying methods of interaction between Portage and user. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
