On Monday 12 December 2005 00:47, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote: > Yeah, I certainly -HOPE- that it will retain its blocker vs. glibc, or > things may slip downhill on a certain rollercoasterride of party and > fun. Not to mention that they claim the same files ;) AS long as nobody does stupid things like touching my ebuild without telling me, it should be safe, I'm quite territorial, so I monitor my own packages..
> Aye, I just raised the point that such packages -do- exist and will(I'm > still not an optimist) be an issue in the future (tm) for you : ) Some packages depends on || condition on libiconv already, I haven't seen a single bug about it since I maintain it. Maybe I'm lucky, maybe the current situation is better handled. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpyO2aCLMXWM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
