Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote: > Another package leaving the tree, again because of transcode1 CLI changes. > It does not work as intended with transcode 1.0 and has other problems, too. > Hoping in newer versions to come out better, I'm going to mask and it's > pending removal one week from now.
If upstream is still alive and a future release might likely work with >=transcode-1.0, isn't it easier to just p.mask it instead of removing it completely and re-adding it at a later date? --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
