Corey Shields wrote: > On Friday 18 November 2005 03:46 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > >>I'm very disappointed that the council did not wait on the vote for this >>considering the sudden submission of the revision of the GLEP. I'm >>curious the reasoning for going ahead with this? > > > So.. I'm hearing that the GLEP was submitted, then a day before the vote it > was revised.. Is that true? It should be voted on the way that it was > submitted. No riders. If it needs to be revised post-submission, then such > submission should be revoked.
No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and taken to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest meeting, it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion. I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I know). -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
