Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Mon Oct 10 2005, 04:43:19PM CDT] > Isn't the idea that someone writes out a draft GLEP and gets it > discussed on -dev (and repeats said process until everyone is happy > with the GLEP) *before* pushing things to the council?
I disagree, but only very slightly. I never expected everybody to be happy before a GLEP is voted upon, but a GLEP should address areas of controversy and either incorporate the new ideas or explain why the authors do not wish to do so. In this way the folks voting on the GLEP are able to make a more informed decision. See GLEP 40 for an example. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpEJU0V4CDEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
