Grant Goodyear wrote: [Mon Oct 10 2005, 05:22:07PM CDT] > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Mon Oct 10 2005, 04:43:19PM CDT] > > Isn't the idea that someone writes out a draft GLEP and gets it > > discussed on -dev (and repeats said process until everyone is happy > > with the GLEP) *before* pushing things to the council? > > I disagree, but only very slightly. I never expected everybody to be > happy before a GLEP is voted upon, but a GLEP should address areas of > controversy and either incorporate the new ideas or explain why the > authors do not wish to do so. In this way the folks voting on the GLEP > are able to make a more informed decision. See GLEP 40 for an example.
I should add that the iterative process, however, _is_ exactly what I envisioned. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpXR5iPV0hCy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
